首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of design-bid-build and design-build project delivery methods on military construction projects
【2h】

A comparison of design-bid-build and design-build project delivery methods on military construction projects

机译:军事建设项目设计投标建设与设计建设项目交付方式比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The US Army Corps of Engineers has adopted the design-build project delivery method as a means to produce military facilities faster and cheaper. An analysis was conducted on 119 military construction projects executed by the US Army Corps of Engineers. While design-build awards may be made earlier in the delivery of military construction projects the design-build project delivery method was shown to have larger contract time growth compared to design-bid-build projects. Military design-build projects experienced a lower total cost of change orders as well as a reduced change order cost associated with field changes.;Finally, statistical analysis demonstrated that no significant difference existed in design-build performance based on the type of facility being constructed. This result indicates that the design-build project delivery method will work equally well on all types of military construction projects.
机译:美国陆军工程兵团已经采用了设计-建造项目交付方式,以此来更快,更便宜地生产军事设施。对美国陆军工程兵团执行的119个军事建设项目进行了分析。尽管可以在军事建设项目的交付中较早地获得设计建造奖,但事实证明,与设计投标建造项目相比,设计建造项目的交付方法具有更大的合同时间增长。军事设计建造项目的变更单总成本较低,并且与现场变更相关的变更单成本降低。最后,统计分析表明,根据所建设施的类型,设计建造性能没有显着差异。 。该结果表明,设计-建造项目交付方法将在所有类型的军事建设项目中同样有效。

著录项

  • 作者

    McWhirt, Darren Dwayne;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号